Relay Pattern Analysis

Relay pattern analysis is a method used by cybersecurity professionals to detect, trace, and understand adversarial behavior that involves the indirect routing or transmission of malicious network traffic through intermediary systems—commonly known as relays. These relays often serve as a cloaking mechanism, obfuscating the source and command infrastructure of an attacker. For cybersecurity operations professionals, particularly in enterprise environments, recognizing and interpreting these patterns is critical for accurate threat attribution, lateral movement detection, and the disruption of advanced persistent threats (APTs).

Understanding the Relay Pattern: Definition and Core Concepts

Relay pattern analysis plays a critical role in understanding how adversaries obscure their operations by using intermediate systems to route malicious traffic. For cybersecurity professionals, recognizing these patterns is essential for uncovering advanced threats and attributing activity across complex network environments.

• Definition and Scope: Relay pattern analysis is the technical process of identifying and mapping indirect traffic paths used by threat actors to conceal origin points. This process includes detecting adversary-controlled infrastructure—such as proxies, compromised hosts, or anonymizing services—that forwards command-and-control (C2) communications, payloads, or exfiltrated data. These patterns often involve layered relays (chained proxies or hop points) designed to frustrate attribution and evade detection systems.

• Relay Infrastructure Types: Adversaries frequently use dynamic infrastructure, such as public cloud VMs, Tor exit nodes, or compromised third-party servers. These systems are often short-lived or rotated regularly, making traditional static detection methods ineffective. They may also use built-in relay capabilities in malware, such as internal reverse proxies or port-forwarding mechanisms, to facilitate lateral movement or internal network pivoting.

• Behavioral Indicators: Relay usage produces observable artifacts, including abnormal communication timing, unexpected protocol or port usage, and asymmetric traffic flows. When correlated across network telemetry, DNS logs, and endpoint behavior, these anomalies can reveal the presence of multi-hop adversary routes designed to mimic legitimate traffic.

Relay pattern analysis enhances an organization’s ability to attribute threats, identify lateral movement, and disrupt attacker infrastructure by focusing on how traffic moves—not just where it originates.

Why Relay Pattern Analysis Matters in Cybersecurity Operations

Relay pattern analysis is essential for enterprise security operations because it reveals the hidden infrastructure threat actors use to evade detection, obscure attribution, and maintain persistence. Understanding why this matters helps security teams prioritize detection and response strategies that are effective against sophisticated, multi-stage attacks.

• Supports Threat Attribution and Actor Profiling: Relay infrastructure is a hallmark of targeted campaigns, particularly those conducted by advanced persistent threats (APTs). Identifying unique relay configurations, traffic timing, or toolsets allows analysts to correlate activity with known threat groups or campaigns. This architecture supports more accurate attribution and enables tailored enrichment of threat intelligence across enterprise environments.

• Enhances Detection of Stealthy Lateral Movement: Relay patterns are often used to mask lateral movement within a network, especially when attackers proxy through compromised internal systems. Analyzing these traffic flows helps detect suspicious east-west activity that bypasses perimeter defenses and can otherwise appear benign or routine when viewed in isolation.

• Improves Incident Response and Containment: By revealing how command-and-control instructions and payloads are routed, relay pattern analysis informs containment strategies. Disrupting relay nodes severs attacker access, isolates malicious traffic paths, and prevents escalation. This enhancement allows security teams to act decisively and minimize dwell time.

Relay pattern analysis provides defenders with a deeper view of the adversary’s operational workflow, enabling proactive detection, precise containment, and a more comprehensive understanding of the attacker’s infrastructure in enterprise-scale environments.

Relay Techniques Used by Threat Actors

Threat actors rely on a variety of relay techniques to obscure their origins, bypass defenses, and maintain resilient access to target environments. Understanding these methods is key to detecting and disrupting the infrastructure supporting advanced threats.

• Use of Anonymizing Services: Services such as Tor, I2P, and commercial VPNs are often used as front-end relays to anonymize attacker traffic. Tor exit nodes in particular are used for initial beaconing or exfiltration due to their public nature and global distribution. These services make attribution difficult by masking true source IP addresses and complicating geolocation analysis.

• Abuse of Cloud Infrastructure: Adversaries increasingly deploy short-lived relay nodes in cloud environments such as AWS, Azure, or DigitalOcean. These virtual instances act as hop points for C2 traffic or payload staging, leveraging trusted IP space and automation to rotate infrastructure rapidly. Their ephemeral nature and use of shared service providers make detection more challenging.

• Compromised Third-Party Systems: Public-facing web servers, routers, or IoT devices with known vulnerabilities are often repurposed as relays. These systems blend into legitimate traffic patterns, reduce the attacker’s infrastructure costs, and are difficult to attribute due to the shared ownership and operational diversity of the compromised hosts.

Relay techniques are continually evolving, with attackers prioritizing stealth, scalability, and resilience. Effective detection requires monitoring behavior across multiple layers—network, endpoint, and infrastructure—to identify these hidden operational paths.

Methods and Techniques for Relay Pattern Analysis & Detection

Detecting relay patterns requires correlation of telemetry across network, DNS, and endpoint layers to identify indirect, adversary-controlled communication paths. This section outlines the core methods and tools SOC teams and threat hunters use to surface relay activity in enterprise environments.

• Network Flow and Traffic Analysis: NetFlow, IPFIX, and packet capture data provide visibility into communication patterns such as consistent connections to rare or high-entropy IP addresses, timing anomalies, and abnormal port usage. Relay chains often exhibit asymmetric traffic or persistent low-volume beacons, which can be flagged through behavioral baselining and time-series analysis.

• DNS and Domain Behavior Monitoring: Passive DNS data and DNS query logs can expose indicators of fast-flux hosting, frequent record changes, or domain generation algorithms (DGAs). Relays often use ephemeral domains registered through bulletproof providers or domain shadowing techniques to evade static blocklists.

• Endpoint and Process-Level Telemetry: EDR tools surface indicators such as abnormal parent-child process hierarchies, misuse of native tools (e.g., netsh, plink, or ssh), named-pipe abuse, and encoded command-line arguments. Combined with threat intelligence, these signals can link internal activity to known relay-enabled malware families.

Accurate relay pattern analysis depends on multi-source telemetry, contextual enrichment, and anomaly detection pipelines. Integrating these techniques into continuous monitoring and threat hunting workflows helps expose hidden adversary routes that traditional perimeter defenses miss.

Operationalizing Relay Pattern Analysis & Intelligence in the SOC

Operationalizing relay pattern analysis in the SOC requires integrating detection logic, intelligence feeds, and response workflows into daily operations. This integration enables security teams to identify, investigate, and respond to threats leveraging relay infrastructure with speed and precision.

• Incorporation into Threat Hunting and Detection Engineering: Relay detection should be built into hypothesis-driven hunts and custom detection rules. Analysts can query SIEM data for outbound traffic to low-reputation IPs, rare domain queries, or inconsistent geolocation hops. Threat detection engineers can enrich alerts using behavioral analytics, correlating network and endpoint signals indicative of relays.

• Automation with SOAR and Intelligence Platforms: SOCs can use SOAR platforms to automate triage and response actions based on relay indicators. Integration with threat intelligence platforms enables real-time enrichment of domains, IPs, and certificates associated with anonymizers or known adversary infrastructure. Automated playbooks can isolate endpoints, flag risky traffic patterns, and escalate alerts with contextual relay intelligence.

• Tactical and Strategic Intelligence Feedback Loops: Relay patterns observed during investigations should be fed back into intelligence cycles to refine actor profiles, TTP mappings, and IOCs. This continuous feedback enhances the SOC’s visibility into evolving infrastructure tactics and supports proactive blocking or threat modeling efforts.

Embedding relay pattern analysis into SOC workflows improves visibility into adversary infrastructure and enables faster, intelligence-driven responses. As threat actors increasingly rely on layered relays, operationalizing this capability is critical to maintaining detection efficacy and reducing dwell time.

Challenges in Relay Pattern Analysis

Relay pattern analysis is critical but inherently complex due to the dynamic, evasive, and increasingly sophisticated nature of adversary infrastructure. SOC teams must navigate several operational and technical challenges to accurately detect and interpret relay usage.

• Encrypted Communications and Limited Visibility: The widespread use of TLS, SSH, VPNs, and DNS-over-HTTPS (DoH) limits packet inspection and obscures payload content. Without SSL inspection or endpoint visibility, relayed communications blend with legitimate encrypted traffic, making anomaly detection heavily dependent on metadata and behavioral context.

• High False Positive Rates: Legitimate services—such as CDNs, cloud proxies, and collaboration tools—often resemble malicious relay infrastructure in traffic patterns. Differentiating benign relays from threat-driven relays requires precise tuning of detection logic and contextual enrichment, especially in environments with extensive third-party integrations or remote access tooling.

• Infrastructure Volatility and Automation: Adversaries frequently rotate relay nodes, using infrastructure-as-code and short-lived cloud instances to minimize detection. This volatility renders static indicators like IP blocklists ineffective, requiring dynamic, behavior-based analysis that can adapt in real time.

• Attribution and Multi-Tenancy Barriers: Shared infrastructure complicates attribution, as cloud IPs or anonymizer nodes may host both benign and malicious activity. Multi-tenancy limits the ability to reliably link relay nodes to specific threat actors without additional intelligence.

Overcoming these challenges requires a layered detection strategy combining network telemetry, endpoint forensics, and threat intelligence. SOCs must invest in scalable analytics, continuous model refinement, and deep contextual correlation to detect relay usage without overwhelming analysts with noise.

Best Practices for Detecting and Mitigating Relay-Based Threats

Detecting and mitigating relay-based threats requires a proactive, layered defense strategy that integrates telemetry, threat intelligence, and adaptive controls. The following best practices enable SOC teams to reduce risk exposure and improve visibility into adversary infrastructure.

• Enhance Telemetry and Data Correlation: Comprehensive logging across DNS, proxy, firewall, endpoint, and network flow layers is foundational. Relay detection relies on correlating subtle indicators—such as low-volume beacons, unusual port use, or rare external destinations—across multiple data sources. Centralizing telemetry in a scalable SIEM or data lake enables pattern recognition and retrospective hunting.

• Leverage Threat Intelligence and Enrichment: Maintain updated threat intelligence feeds that include anonymizer services, dynamic DNS providers, cloud-hosted relay indicators, and infrastructure linked to known APT groups. Enrich observables during alert triage or hunting to contextualize IPs, domains, and certificates. Use threat scoring to prioritize investigating infrastructure with a high likelihood of malicious use.

• Implement Access and Network Controls: Apply geofencing, IP reputation filtering, and egress controls at firewall and proxy layers to block traffic to known high-risk regions and anonymization networks. Use micro-segmentation to isolate sensitive assets and limit internal east-west traffic that could be exploited as internal relay paths.

• Adopt Zero Trust and Least Privilege Principles: Enforce authentication, authorization, and context-based access for all users and services. This policy minimizes the risk of internal systems being used as unauthorized relay nodes and reduces the opportunities for lateral movement if a compromise occurs.

A strong relay detection posture requires continuous tuning of detection rules, automated correlation, and integration with incident response workflows. Combining strategic architecture decisions with operational agility equips defenders to detect, disrupt, and contain relay-enabled threats before they escalate.

Emerging Trends in Relay Pattern Evasion and Detection

As adversaries adapt to detection techniques, new trends are shaping the future of relay pattern analysis, detection, and evasion. These developments are forcing defenders to evolve their tooling, analytics, and intelligence models to stay effective.

• Abuse of Legitimate Services for Relays: Attackers increasingly leverage trusted cloud platforms, CDNs, and collaboration tools as relay infrastructure. Services like Cloudflare Workers, GitHub Pages, or messaging APIs (e.g., Slack, Discord) are being co-opted for proxying C2 traffic and payload distribution. These platforms offer high availability, blend into enterprise traffic, and are challenging to blacklist without operational risk.

• Encryption and Protocol Obfuscation: Encrypted DNS (DoH/DoT), QUIC, and custom tunneling protocols are being adopted to evade traditional DPI-based detection. Relays now often encapsulate payloads within non-standard or multiplexed protocols, reducing signature match accuracy and masking traffic characteristics critical for behavioral analysis.

• Autonomous Infrastructure Rotation: Threat actors use infrastructure-as-code and bot-driven orchestration to automatically spin up and retire relay nodes across multiple cloud providers. This rapid churn reduces the window for IOC-based detection and requires defenders to pivot toward pattern-of-life and statistical anomaly models.

• ML-Driven Detection and Federated Analysis: To combat evasion, defenders are deploying machine learning models trained on network behavior, enriched with contextual telemetry. Federated learning is emerging to enable cross-organization relay pattern recognition without direct data sharing, supporting collaborative defense models.

Emerging trends indicate greater reliance by adversaries on disposable, encrypted, and legitimate-looking infrastructure. Effective detection now depends on advanced correlation, cloud-native analytics, and continuous adaptation of behavioral baselines.

Conclusion

Relay pattern analysis is a critical discipline within cybersecurity operations, providing the visibility and context needed to detect advanced threat actors who rely on indirect communication paths to avoid detection. For cybersecurity leaders and practitioners protecting enterprise environments, especially in high-value Fortune 1000 organizations, this analytical approach supports accurate threat attribution, improved incident response, and effective disruption of adversary infrastructure.

Operationalizing this capability requires a blend of behavioral detection, threat intelligence correlation, and architectural controls. As adversaries innovate, defenders must evolve in parallel—continuously refining their ability to detect, interpret, and act on the hidden paths that adversaries use to move undetected within and across networks.

Deepwatch® is the pioneer of AI- and human-driven cyber resilience. By combining AI, security data, intelligence, and human expertise, the Deepwatch Platform helps organizations reduce risk through early and precise threat detection and remediation. Ready to Become Cyber Resilient? Meet with our managed security experts to discuss your use cases, technology, and pain points, and learn how Deepwatch can help.

Related Content

• Move Beyond Detection and Response to Accelerate Cyber Resilience: This resource explores how security operations teams can evolve beyond reactive detection and response toward proactive, adaptive resilience strategies. It outlines methods to reduce dwell time, accelerate threat mitigation, and align SOC capabilities with business continuity goals.

• The Dawn of Collaborative Agentic AI in MDR: In this whitepaper, learn about the groundbreaking collaborative agentic AI ecosystem that is redefining managed detection and response services. Discover how the Deepwatch platform’s dual focus on both security operations (SOC) enhancement and customer experience ultimately drives proactive defense strategies that align with organizational goals.
• 2024 Deepwatch Adversary Tactics & Intelligence Annual Threat Report: The 2024 threat report offers an in-depth analysis of evolving adversary tactics, including keylogging, credential theft, and the use of remote access tools. It provides actionable intelligence, MITRE ATT&CK mapping, and insights into the behaviors of threat actors targeting enterprise networks.